Anustup Basu,
The Human and his Spectacular Autumn, or, Informatics after Philosophy
- Abstract:
This essay revisits a few core postulates of an idealistic modernity of the west that was based on the voluntarism of the human
subject, the rational workings of the secular state, and a scientific episteme of power/knowledge that was to absolve a godless, historical
universe of dogma and miracle. But perhaps, as it has been increasingly apparent, a new form of sovereign power is making itself immanent in our
times. Instead of a historical agency of the conscientious human, or an isomorphic relationship between disciplinary knowledge and power, the
global application of this form of sovereignty is based more on the temporal and spatial inseparability among moments of militarization,
informatization, and financialization. As a result, categories and definitions of a classic liberal political imagination--like fascism for
instance--can no longer be simply attached to human profiles or human tasks. This new, dogmatic, faith-based sovereignty of informatics and
technology-in-and-of-itself is diffuse and micro-punctual in its presence, unlike the world-historical spectacle of the mad Führer. In the wake
of specific molar technologies for producing social life itself, one has to be attentive to a transformed situation in which meritorious
conversations between humans are increasingly overwritten by a great dictatorial monologue of power, by which money alone, along with its
complex corporatist-statist interests, speaks to itself.
How does one re-think politics and resistance in such a scenario, where inhuman assemblages and flows of finance and interests--mega-forces of
funding and facilitation--override communicative presumptions about scientific truths and pieties of democratic representation? How do we
start thinking in this moment of danger in a manner that is neither driven by paranoia nor enclosed in an ivory tower of angelic ironies?
--ab
Pelagia Goulimari,
"Myriad Little Connections": Minoritarian Movements in the Postmodernism Debate
- Abstract: The canonical phase of the postmodernism debate, in the work of Fredric
Jameson and others, bequeathed to us a model of interaction between
minoritarian movements which it is our challenge now to leave behind:
minoritarian movements as non-communicating fragments in need of unification
by a hegemonic force. In our post-hegemonic world, I return to Deleuze and
Guattari's Anti-Oedipus for a "new" model of interaction: escaping the
false dilemma of fragmentation versus unification, minoritarian movements
are distinct, having nothing in common, as well as unceasingly interacting
in myriad little encounters.
--pg
Jason B. Jones,
The Time of Interpretation: Psychoanalysis and the Past
- Abstract:
Though "deferred action" has entered the theoretical lexicon of the humanities, Lacan's theory of
causality is still poorly understood, as are its implications for interpretation. This essay argues
that the return to Freud reveals psychoanalysis to be in the first instance a theory of temporality and
history. Against conventional understandings of psychoanalysis as a recovery of the past--the view that
the "cure" works because one remembers what "really happened"--Lacan proposes that interpretation works
by depleting the analysand's putative knowledge of the past. Paradoxically, by draining the past of
meaning, Lacanian analysis binds us to the work of history. The essay offers a systematic reading of
Lacan's 1950s works on technique, connecting these with later developments to clarify the
anti-narrative emphasis in psychoanalytic theory. --jbj
Robert Payne, Virtually: The Refreshment of Interface Value
- Abstract:
This essay examines virtual representation as a source of anxiety--moral, cultural, and epistemological. By first
analyzing two failed attempts by the U.S. Congress to apply legislative closure to the admitted epistemological
uncertainty of virtual child pornography, the question of performativity is raised. The Congressional Acts'
contradictory logic imagined a contagion of harm emanating from digital material and attacking actual, uninvolved
children, but also a contagion of perpetration to "desensitize" potentially any viewer. The essay pivots on Margaret
Morse's definition of the virtual as the "present subjunctive mode of a fictively shared present" and goes on to
examine the equally uncertain performativity attributed to the virtual relationships between personal webcam subjects
and their viewers. Charges of "virtual prostitution" against some female webcam subjects recall Congress's moralist
fears of infectious "transmission." As a device of perceived telepresence and telepistemology, webcam representation
is discussed as the reiteration of interface simulation, where the continuous, mechanical "refreshment" of this
mediating device itself becomes an object of attention. The necessary imprecision and epistemological frustration of
the virtual has become a compelling narrative of its own. --rp
Copyright (c) 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1993,
1992, 1991, 1990 Postmodern Culture & the Johns Hopkins University Press.
CONTENTS OF THIS ISSUE ARE
AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE UNTIL RELEASE OF THE NEXT ISSUE. A
TEXT-ONLY ARCHIVE OF THE JOURNAL IS ALSO AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE.
FOR FULL HYPERTEXT ACCESS TO BACK ISSUES, SEARCH UTILITIES, AND OTHER
VALUABLE FEATURES, YOU OR YOUR INSTITUTION MAY
SUBSCRIBE
TO PROJECT MUSE, THE ON-LINE JOURNALS
PROJECT OF THE JOHNS
HOPKINS UNIVERSITY PRESS.
|